sinking to new lows
The behavior of some (or a lot) of the mainstream media has been downright despicable of late. I recently added NewsBusters to my blogroll, and today read there that the McCain campaign has been inundated with requests/demands from media outlets that they provide DNA samples from Sarah Palin to prove that she is indeed the mother of 4 month old son Trig. The incessant and ignorant rumor mill is obsessed with the notion that Trig is actually the son of 17 year old Bristol Palin, who herself is currently 5 months pregnant.
Who do these reporters think they are anyway? So I guess John McCain is supposed to call up Sarah Palin’s doctor and make her an appointment to get a DNA test? And why in the world is the media wanting to make this a contest between Barack Obama and a 17 year old girl anyway? Lost somewhere in all this foolishness is the fact that Obama is running for president against John McCain… not Sarah Palin, and certainly not Bristol Palin. They’re hyperventilating over these things like it’s going to spell the end of our country as we know it if Mrs. Palin becomes Vice President. Where was all the outrage and indignation when a married, sitting president was misbehaving right in the Oval Office? Back then we were told it wasn’t anyone’s business what the President did in his private life… except that he was conducting affairs (no pun intended there) of state while engaged in these so-called private acts. I know the Clinton’s are a non-factor in this race, too, but I bring that up to illustrate the hypocrisy that’s at work here.
But blind, slavish devotion is a powerful thing. Much of the mainstream media is unabashedly head-over-heels with Mr. Obama. MSNBC’s Chris Matthews cannot even contain himself when speaking of the Democratic presidential nominee…
“I have to tell you, you know, it’s part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama’s speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg.”
Ummm… so much for objectivity in the media, wouldn’t you say? To be fair though, Matthews used to be in the tank for George W. Bush, so at least he’s an equal opportunity biased reporter.
But back to the problem at hand… we now have reporters who feel that they have some sort of inalienable right of access to something as personal as DNA from a political candidate. Not to prove that she committed adultery, but to try and somehow influence an election by going after a young girl who isn’t running for anything. Now, I’m not here to defend what Bristol Palin has done, not at all. Anyone who knows me or has read this blog much knows how I feel about that situation (her being pregnant now, I mean… not the wild accusations that she is the mother of Trig Palin), although by all accounts she has taken responsibility for her actions, and she has chosen life for her baby. But the simple fact is that her situation has absolutely no bearing on the presidential race, despite what the mainstream media wants you to believe.
If I were a journalist in the current climate, I think I’d find a job in a completely unrelated field just to avoid being guilty by association. The rest, I hope, will find it within themselves to repent.
Posts
